A US judge on Wednesday rejected a request from actress Amber Heard (36) to set aside the $10m defamation judgment awarded against her in favour of her ex-husband, Johnny Depp (59).
Despite a poor performance in court Heard’s lawyers filed the motion last month claiming the conclusion she had defamed Depp was not supported by evidence and that one of the juror’s had not been properly vetted.
โThe court cannot assume, as Mr Depp asks it to, that Juror 15โs apparently improper service was an innocent mistake. It could have been an intentional attempt to serve on the jury of a high-profile case,โ Heardโs lawyers wrote.
In a written order on Wednesday, Judge Penney Azcarate rejected all Heardโs claims and said the juror issue specifically was irrelevant and that Heard cannot show she was prejudiced.
โThe juror was vetted, sat for the entire jury, deliberated, and reached a verdict,โ Azcarate wrote. โThe only evidence before this court is that this juror and all jurors followed their oaths, the courtโs instructions, and orders. This court is bound by the competent decision of the jury.โ
Depp was awarded $10.35million in damages from Heard, while she was awarded just $2million in damages from Depp.
This meant Heard was left owing Depp a whopping $8.35million which she says she cannot afford to pay.
After Heard wrote a 2018 op-ed in the Washington Post describing herself as โa public figure representing domestic abuseโ, Depp sued for $50m in Fairfax county.
Although she did not mention him by name, his lawyers were able to prove that the passages in the article defamed him by implication.
Discover more from Daily Mast
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

